Returns to the moment before the casting of that spell was proposed Steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal the game The casting of a spell, a player is unable to comply with any of the Spell to begin this process (see rule 601.3). A player must be legally allowed to cast the To cast a spell, a player follows the steps Proposal of the spell (rules 601.2a–d) and determination and payment To cast a spell is to take it from where it is (usually the hand), put it on the stack, and pay its costs, so that it willĮventually resolve and have its effect. Oblivion Ring), the judges ruling would more than likely be valid.Ħ01.2. However, if the spell you cast did not target as part of resolution, and rather targets as part of a triggered ability (e.g. However, this reading of the rules would need to completely ignore 721.1's " starts to take an action but can’t legally complete it, the entire action is reversed and any payments already made are canceled" Normally targeting an illegal creature would just roll back to before the casting started, but the combination of the ' unable' in 601.2's " If a player is unable to comply with any of the steps listed below, the casting of the spell is illegal " and 601.2c's " The player announces their choice of an appropriate object or player for each target the spell requires" could be taken to mean that once a casting was started a play would have to complete it if there were valid targets. They will be wearing the same uniform as the Head Judge.Īssuming that the spell in question targeted as part of it's casting, this seems to be a rather unusual, and probably incorrect implementation of Rule 601.2 and 601.2c, and completely ignores 721.1. In larger, Premier-level tournaments (such as Grand Prix and Magic Tabletop Mythic Championships), with prior approval, the Head Judge may designate additional Appeals Judges who are also empowered to hear appeals. If a player disagrees with a judge’s ruling, they may appeal the ruling to the Head Judge. In general, if you disagree with a judge's ruling or remedy, you can appeal in accordance with section 2.9 of the Magic Tournament Rules: From that description it seems likely that they simply assumed that the opponent was correct, or knew what they were talking about. The fact that the judge took their cue from the opponent when determining the remedy makes this additionally questionable. If the action was casting a spell, the spell returns to the zone it came from. If a player takes an illegal action or starts to take an action but can’t legally complete it, the entire action is reversed and any payments already made are canceled. It is not inconceivable that a judge could interpret these instructions as allowing them to do a backup to after you announced the spell and before you chose targets, but that would be a stretch, and essentially inconsistent with rule 721.1: The GRV remedy section then further says that partial remedies can then be applied to only a specific set of situations, none of which match the situation in question. Every action must be reversed no parts of the sequence should be omitted or reordered. To perform a backup, each individual action since the point of the error is reversed, starting with the most recent ones and working backwards. The remedy section for that item says that a judge should first consider a simple backup. The situation in question looks like a "Game Play Error - Game Rule Violation". The guide for judges handling rules infractions is called the Infraction Procedure Guide.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |